Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comparing port work and results

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comparing port work and results

    My previous thread in the pushrod performance section was trying to go off topic, so I am going to start one with a broader topic range. I admit it is difficult for the majority of people to do a comparison between parts from different companies due to marketing and equipment. By using the same flowbench here at WOT-Tech, I hope this takes some of the guess work out.

    First and foremost, an explanation of what a flowbench does and its importance. A flowbench measures airflow through any part, both in air flow (cfm) and depression (inches of water). The standard years ago was 10" of water, but 28" has been the preferred measurement for quite some time now. For cylinder heads, it is common practice to use clay to create a rounded entrance to the port. This is done to utilize the entire port rather than have turbulence at the port opening limiting the flow. For exhaust, a tube is attached for the same reason. The same method is repeated for all parts.

    No one has more time researching the 3100, 3400, or 3500 heads and manifolds on a flowbench than WOT-Tech. Our closest competitor doesn't even use a flowbench to test porting! I have a copy of the flow numbers they advertise offline (you wont see them posted on their site), and its substantially higher than any numbers recorded here at WOT-Tech. This could be for any number of reasons, none of which are especially important because we won't be comparing with those numbers.

    This is all well and good, but flow numbers certainly aren't the only thing to compare outside of dyno/track results. Designing heads and manifolds is much more than the most flow (unless you are boosted, then flow is what you want under boost conditions). Velocity is what keeps the intake charge rushing into the combustion chamber even after the piston has reached bottom dead center, and has started to move back up the cylinder. This little bit of extra air/fuel is what gives more power. Velocity in the ports are measured with velocity tubes and there are more in depth issues with flow shape and fuel drop out. The easiest way to compare velocity however, is to measure the ports displacement. A larger port will have slower air speeds. If this was not the case, everyone would run the largest heads possible on their V8s.

    The first comparison is between the WOT-Tech Competition 3400 heads and the MMS Stage 2 heads. Below are the displacement measurements

    Stock 3400 Intake = 111.4cc
    WOT-Tech Competition Intake = 113.5cc
    MMS Stage 2 Intake = 117.2cc

    Stock 3400 Exhaust = 70cc
    WOT-Tech Competition Exhaust = 72cc
    MMS Stage 2 Exhaust = 76.2cc


    That should give you a good idea of the size difference between the 2 heads. Now for the flow numbers, which are at 28” depression using a 3.700” bore size. I list this because it is impossible to compare numbers to another bench without having this information. Bore size is critical to testing for real world results. More important on straight valves, the same principle holds true for the canted valves of the aluminum head 60V6 heads. As the valve opens, it moves away from the cylinder wall. However, the airflow past the combustion chamber wall is still influenced by the bore, creating its own dynamic flow pattern vs valve lift off the seat.

    The following is not going to format well on this forum, but the first row is the valve lift off the seat in .050" increments, followed by the MMS S2 and then the WOT-Tech Comp series 3400 head. You can also check out this link to see it formatted better, along with the WOT-Tech Race series numbers

    3400 Intake

    Lift / Stock/ MMS S2 / WOT-Tech Competition

    0.050..... 31.6..... 33.2..... 35.3
    0.100..... 55.4..... 60.9..... 63.4
    0.150..... 78.1..... 85.3..... 89.9
    0.200..... 101.3..... 109.5.... 116.7
    0.250..... 125.4..... 133.1.... 142.9
    0.300..... 148.1..... 155.7.... 166.7
    0.350..... 170.0..... 176.6.... 187.3
    0.400..... 187.8..... 194.2.... 203.6
    0.450..... 201.1..... 210.6.... 217.4
    0.500..... 210.1..... 224.8.... 227.7

    3400 Exhaust

    Lift / Stock/ MMS S2 / WOT-Tech Competition

    0.050..... 27.1..... 28.4..... 25.2
    0.100..... 53.0..... 56.4..... 51.8
    0.150..... 78.4..... 83.5..... 87.6
    0.200..... 98.4..... 105.1.... 112.6
    0.250..... 116.8..... 123.2.... 131.2
    0.300..... 133.8..... 135.8.... 148.1
    0.350..... 144.4..... 144.9.... 158.4
    0.400..... 151.5..... 151.0.... 167.1
    0.450..... 155.1..... 157.1.... 174.0
    0.500..... 157.0..... 160.6.... 178.8


    The WOT-Tech heads have smaller ports that flow more. The exhaust side is important for NA and Turbo applications, because smaller ports keep the exhaust gas hotter. Hotter exhaust travels faster, and spools a turbo quicker. Our race heads have the exact same exhaust ports because of their efficiency.
    Last edited by SappySE107; 06-21-2010, 12:36 PM.
    Ben
    60DegreeV6.com
    WOT-Tech.com

  • #2
    i like how you remove less head material, but can flow a hell of a lot more... shows that you can't just go to town with a die grinder and hog the whole damn thing and expect good results...

    don't suppose you have stock 3400 flow numbers to throw up in there for a better idea of what kind of difference the porting is making?
    1995 Monte Carlo LS 3100, 4T60E...for now, future plans include driving it until the wheels fall off!
    Latest nAst1 files here!
    Need a wiring diagram for any GM car or truck from 82-06(and 07-08 cars)? PM me!

    Comment


    • #3
      Updated with stock numbers in place.
      Ben
      60DegreeV6.com
      WOT-Tech.com

      Comment


      • #4
        nice gains. any tests above .500" lift? where do they stall out at?

        Comment


        • #5
          MMS keep going up past .600". WOT-Tech taper off from .550 on. Stock tapers off as well. Port size has to do with this since the Race heads keep increasing as well.
          Ben
          60DegreeV6.com
          WOT-Tech.com

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Honest Don View Post
            nice gains. any tests above .500" lift? where do they stall out at?
            Well if you think about it, when the valve hits max lift, it is only there for a nano-second, whereas the valve will pass mid lift twice for each open/close event. Since this is the case, a good head porter will go for the most gain from ~.200"to about .450" - where the valve will spend most of it's life
            Links:
            WOT-Tech.com
            FaceBook
            Instagram

            Comment


            • #7
              what are stock 3500 heads? just curious if u knew
              MODS: DS CAI, TCE 65 mm tb, TCE AFPR, TCE LS lifter springs, WOT ported UIM and LIM, 3500 heads, comp cams valve springs locks and retainers, 1393 grind cam, S&S headers, custom 2.5 in catback, flowmaster 80 series , no rez, and to top it all off, an MPR tune. Among misc gauges and appearence things

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by ForcedFirebird View Post
                Well if you think about it, when the valve hits max lift, it is only there for a nano-second, whereas the valve will pass mid lift twice for each open/close event. Since this is the case, a good head porter will go for the most gain from ~.200"to about .450" - where the valve will spend most of it's life
                not gonna argue with that

                Comment

                Working...
                X