Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

3.6L DI Heads w/Integrated Exhaust Manifolds

Collapse
X
Collapse
  •  

  • 3.6L DI Heads w/Integrated Exhaust Manifolds

    I think we have briefly discussed the new integrated exhaust manifold heads in the forums before, and it seemed most people were against it with the inability to install better flowing headers, etc. After watching the video, and reading the associated article, it actually seems that these may have some good potential. It sure would be interesting to get one of these heads to take a hands-on look at. With that said, onto the video and article!




    Originally from GM Powertrain...
    PONTIAC, Mich. – In auto production, more power, better fuel economy and fewer emissions rarely appear together. But the 2012 Camaro 3.6L direct injection V6 engine achieves all three by combining the exhaust manifold with the cylinder head into a single aluminum casting.

    Each integrated exhaust manifold cylinder head – a V6 has two -- replaces a cast iron exhaust manifold, six bolts, a gasket and a heat shield and three bolts. By eliminating this joint, the potential for a gasket failure is eliminated. And the change reduces engine weight by 13 lbs. or 6 kg per engine. Reducing mass helps improve fuel economy and the 2012 Camaro 2LS model is EPA estimated at 30 mpg highway.

    “Reducing engine mass of this magnitude doesn’t happen often,” said Ameer Haider, GM assistant chief engineer for V6 engines. “Engineering usually looks for reduction in terms of grams not pounds. It’s just like removing a set of golf clubs from your car when you don’t need them – ultimately it saves fuel. When combined with other mass reductions, the customer will see better fuel economy over time with better performance.”

    Extensive simulation and bench testing was performed to perfect cylinder-head airflow. Intake airflow is improved 7 percent with the use of larger intake valves (38.3 mm v. 36.9 mm), which are primarily responsible for an increase of 11 horsepower. Exhaust flow is 10 percent better than the previous V6.

    Lower emissions, narrower engine size and noise reduction round out the list of benefits for the new head design. With the catalytic converter closer to the engine exhaust point, the emissions reduction process begins sooner, resulting in lower emissions. The new cylinder heads decrease the overall width of the engine by 4.6 inches (117 mm) for significantly more packaging space in the engine bay making underhood work easier. Due to less surface area, the new design contributes to a 1 decibel reduction in engine noise at idle.

    “The new, patented design benefits the customer in all the key areas without any tradeoffs, said Haider. “Emissions, performance, fuel economy, and noise all improve with the integrated exhaust manifold.”

    • Romeo
      #12
      Romeo commented
      Editing a comment
      Your Grand Am is a smaller car, with less interior bits and bobs to lug around. lol

    • ireload2
      #13
      ireload2 commented
      Editing a comment
      >>>In auto production, more power, better fuel economy and fewer emissions rarely appear together.<<<
      This is mostly a lie.
      The manifolds were integrated to save the cost of the manifolds. It probably saves GM about $35 or $40 bucks and engine. No manifolds and fewer holes to drill and tap. Of course the heads are going to run hotter and may crack but GM will probably get most heads to last well past the warranty period.

    • pocket-rocket
      #14
      pocket-rocket commented
      Editing a comment
      No gaskets either.

      Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk
    Posting comments is disabled.

Article Tags

Collapse

There are no tags yet.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • LZ Wiring Pinouts
    by SappySE107
    This is from a 07 Saturn Aura, so it might differ a bit from others. I can add whatever needs to be added to this, just let me know.










    ...
    08-20-2024, 03:31 PM
  • Gen 1 Flowsheets
    by SappySE107
    I only have the Camaro 3.1 for testing, so there are a lot of options not currently covered. The test head is here should I come across any other setups.

    28", 3.700" bore, PAP % 100cfm +5% 200cfm +1% 300cfm +1%

    Bare head vs with full intake/throttle body, and the exhaust flow with a 1 5/8 header stub.

    ...
    08-18-2024, 01:37 PM
  • Gen 2 Flowsheets
    by SappySE107
    Might be a work in progress? Lets just get started and see where it goes. 28", 3.700" bore. PAP % 100cfm +5% 200cfm +1% 300cfm +1%

    Starting off with the bare head, using clay to bellmouth the port inlet.


    Next we will put the intake manifolds on, with the throttle body and all vac ported blocked and untested ports taped off. This shows flow distribution between all runners.



    This is the comparison sheet for the middle port using...
    08-18-2024, 12:04 PM
  • Getting an error? Please post a reply here.
    by SappySE107
    I have had some pages tell me it can't be loaded and to contact an admin. Couldn't even get to them from the admin panel. Poked around a bit, changed the order of the articles, and then the articles that wouldn't load simply weren't on the list. AWESOME! but wait, a refresh on the browser and now they all work. HA! I had just updated some of them a couple days ago so I currently have no idea what this is about, but if you have that or anything else give an error, please let me know here.
    07-31-2024, 08:56 PM
  • Using an adjustable pushrod for lifter preload
    by SappySE107
    Our engines use non adjustable rocker arms, so pushrod length is import to lifter preload, which is important for performance. Incorrect preload does change power on the dyno, or in extreme cases, the ability to run well or at all.

    There are 2 options for the adjustable pushrods, a shorter option custom made for wot-tech for use on 3100/3400/3500 LX9 engines. These measure below 5.700", which is very short for an automotive engine. The other option is a Comp pushrod that measures...
    07-18-2024, 12:29 AM
  • Fresh Install, New Server
    by SappySE107
    Brad got the site up and running again and its finally responsive again! I will be spending some time creating articles based on what I used to have on the old WOT-Tech site before going to Square, as well as posting some more dyno results as we get them @ R&R Motorsports. Still working on what isn't working still, like the avatars, but most seems to be working. Any issues, please post on the forum, or respond to this article....
    03-22-2024, 05:51 PM
Working...
X