NA build (high compression)
Turbo (stock compression)
Well after tearing the whole car down and thinking about all this work I am putting into it for what 200-225hp NA? Every performance car I have owned has had a power adder and my friend thinks I need to learn to build without one. So After thinking it out I think an old TGP turbo setup would be a good option to make more power and still be street able with good MPG (if I can stay out of boost). Later I can upgrade the turbo and the IC to support more boost. Only issue would be the trans which will be replaced with a 5 speed later on this year.
So Should I go high compression NA or leave it stock compression and put a turbo setup on it when I find one for sale or piece one together?
So what do ya'll think? What kind of power will a stock TGP turbo setup support?
Last edited by bkaab; 02-07-2012 at 05:38 PM.
2001 Grand Prix Topswap GT-(12.71@107.92mph)
1996 Grand Prix SE-(17.32@80.23mph) Turbo Project
1990 Turbo Grand Prix-project restore
For all the time, effort and money i put into my car to run 12's N/A, i could be deep into the 10's with boost. How do i feel about that? Much better when i slam open the throttle and hear the ITB's scream.
You don't need crazy high compression to make good power N/A. Build a good foundation so that if you decide to boost later on all you have to do is a cam swap and build the turbo setup.
1989 Camaro RS; Cammed 3500 swap, 45mm ITB's, Street/Strip Kitted 700R4, 3500 stall, Megashifter, 3.73 posi, EQ- LT headers, 2.25" True Duals, X pipe, etc...
Would a set of TGP pistons be good choice compared to a stock replacement for a 3100? I would go forged but they are a out side of my price range.
2001 Grand Prix Topswap GT-(12.71@107.92mph)
1996 Grand Prix SE-(17.32@80.23mph) Turbo Project
1990 Turbo Grand Prix-project restore
3100 pistons would be ideal for the quench. 9.5:1 is low compression. 8.8:1 is lame compression. That is how I feel about it anyway:P
Ben
60DegreeV6.com
WOT-Tech.com
How much boost will they be able to support?
2001 Grand Prix Topswap GT-(12.71@107.92mph)
1996 Grand Prix SE-(17.32@80.23mph) Turbo Project
1990 Turbo Grand Prix-project restore
Tough questions to ask. Supported boost and compression ratio are dependent on fuel and fuel delivery. I've posted a link to a turbo engine running E85 and 11:1 with over 20psi boost. But that is direct injected.....
The better question to ask is 'how fast do you want to go & how much do you have to spend?'
For a 3.1.... If you have a turbo crank and TGP internals you could probably run 300-350 easy with a bit of intercooling and the right turbo.
DO NOT use TGP logs for turbo plumbing. Learn from my mistakes. /cries
1990 ASC/McLaren Turbo Grand Prix 3500 swap GT3076R turbo 40lb/hr injectors FMIC LX9 coils Megasquirt2 v3.0
2001 Grand Prix Topswap GT-(12.71@107.92mph)
1996 Grand Prix SE-(17.32@80.23mph) Turbo Project
1990 Turbo Grand Prix-project restore
If your going to do a 5 speed swap soon.I would say even 225whp.Would get you into the 13's easy.Onces i got the hang of racing it was easy to run 14's all day.On a stock 3400 with headers.My car isn't even completely tuned yet.
And it's like a different car.I did the same thing you are doing now last year.Either way good luck=)
The TGP stuff is basically the same, it's nothing special or magical. There used to be a great page at http://www.turbograndprix.com/Extens...ifferences.htm with all the details but it's gone now.
The heads are different than the N/A version, and actually flow worse on both sides. I tested both on my bench, the TGP casting quality is terrible.
I did save some of the info somewhere, if i can find it i'll post it up.
1989 Camaro RS; Cammed 3500 swap, 45mm ITB's, Street/Strip Kitted 700R4, 3500 stall, Megashifter, 3.73 posi, EQ- LT headers, 2.25" True Duals, X pipe, etc...