View Poll Results: NA or Turbo

Voters
10. You may not vote on this poll
  • NA build (high compression)

    3 30.00%
  • Turbo (stock compression)

    7 70.00%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: NA or Turbo?

  1. #1

    NA or Turbo?

    Well after tearing the whole car down and thinking about all this work I am putting into it for what 200-225hp NA? Every performance car I have owned has had a power adder and my friend thinks I need to learn to build without one. So After thinking it out I think an old TGP turbo setup would be a good option to make more power and still be street able with good MPG (if I can stay out of boost). Later I can upgrade the turbo and the IC to support more boost. Only issue would be the trans which will be replaced with a 5 speed later on this year.

    So Should I go high compression NA or leave it stock compression and put a turbo setup on it when I find one for sale or piece one together?

    So what do ya'll think? What kind of power will a stock TGP turbo setup support?
    Last edited by bkaab; 02-07-2012 at 05:38 PM.

    2001 Grand Prix Topswap GT-(12.71@107.92mph)
    1996 Grand Prix SE-(17.32@80.23mph) Turbo Project
    1990 Turbo Grand Prix-project restore

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    6 > 1 Superdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Quad Cities, Iowa
    Posts
    5,109
    For all the time, effort and money i put into my car to run 12's N/A, i could be deep into the 10's with boost. How do i feel about that? Much better when i slam open the throttle and hear the ITB's scream.


    You don't need crazy high compression to make good power N/A. Build a good foundation so that if you decide to boost later on all you have to do is a cam swap and build the turbo setup.


    1989 Camaro RS; Cammed 3500 swap, 45mm ITB's, Street/Strip Kitted 700R4, 3500 stall, Megashifter, 3.73 posi, EQ- LT headers, 2.25" True Duals, X pipe, etc...

  4. #3
    Would a set of TGP pistons be good choice compared to a stock replacement for a 3100? I would go forged but they are a out side of my price range.

    2001 Grand Prix Topswap GT-(12.71@107.92mph)
    1996 Grand Prix SE-(17.32@80.23mph) Turbo Project
    1990 Turbo Grand Prix-project restore

  5. #4
    Captain of the Failboat SappySE107's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Pompano Beach, Florida
    Posts
    12,339
    3100 pistons would be ideal for the quench. 9.5:1 is low compression. 8.8:1 is lame compression. That is how I feel about it anyway:P
    Ben
    60DegreeV6.com
    WOT-Tech.com

  6. #5
    How much boost will they be able to support?

    2001 Grand Prix Topswap GT-(12.71@107.92mph)
    1996 Grand Prix SE-(17.32@80.23mph) Turbo Project
    1990 Turbo Grand Prix-project restore

  7. #6
    Tough questions to ask. Supported boost and compression ratio are dependent on fuel and fuel delivery. I've posted a link to a turbo engine running E85 and 11:1 with over 20psi boost. But that is direct injected.....

    The better question to ask is 'how fast do you want to go & how much do you have to spend?'

    For a 3.1.... If you have a turbo crank and TGP internals you could probably run 300-350 easy with a bit of intercooling and the right turbo.

  8. #7
    DO NOT use TGP logs for turbo plumbing. Learn from my mistakes. /cries

    1990 ASC/McLaren Turbo Grand Prix 3500 swap GT3076R turbo 40lb/hr injectors FMIC LX9 coils Megasquirt2 v3.0

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by NateD4 View Post
    Tough questions to ask. Supported boost and compression ratio are dependent on fuel and fuel delivery. I've posted a link to a turbo engine running E85 and 11:1 with over 20psi boost. But that is direct injected.....

    The better question to ask is 'how fast do you want to go & how much do you have to spend?'

    For a 3.1.... If you have a turbo crank and TGP internals you could probably run 300-350 easy with a bit of intercooling and the right turbo.
    What different TGP internals? From what I've read and looking at part numbers most things are the same.

    I'm shooting for 250hp-300hp. High 13s would be great but solid 14s is what id like to run consistantly.

    2001 Grand Prix Topswap GT-(12.71@107.92mph)
    1996 Grand Prix SE-(17.32@80.23mph) Turbo Project
    1990 Turbo Grand Prix-project restore

  10. #9
    If your going to do a 5 speed swap soon.I would say even 225whp.Would get you into the 13's easy.Onces i got the hang of racing it was easy to run 14's all day.On a stock 3400 with headers.My car isn't even completely tuned yet.
    And it's like a different car.I did the same thing you are doing now last year.Either way good luck=)

  11. #10
    6 > 1 Superdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Quad Cities, Iowa
    Posts
    5,109
    The TGP stuff is basically the same, it's nothing special or magical. There used to be a great page at http://www.turbograndprix.com/Extens...ifferences.htm with all the details but it's gone now.

    The heads are different than the N/A version, and actually flow worse on both sides. I tested both on my bench, the TGP casting quality is terrible.


    I did save some of the info somewhere, if i can find it i'll post it up.


    1989 Camaro RS; Cammed 3500 swap, 45mm ITB's, Street/Strip Kitted 700R4, 3500 stall, Megashifter, 3.73 posi, EQ- LT headers, 2.25" True Duals, X pipe, etc...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •