Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Modifying a 3400 for MPG

  1. #1
    Captain of the Failboat SappySE107's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Pompano Beach, Florida
    Posts
    12,339

    Modifying a 3400 for MPG

    I received an email and decided to copy and paste to here.

    Hello,
    I would like to make changes to my motor that
    would increase gas milage instead of hp. On the
    internet when looking up the subject many people
    argue back and forth on some hot rodding subjcts
    if they increase gas milage at all. Except hotter spark
    most people agree but does better air flow ,higher compression,
    and headers. What is your experence in better mpg's.
    Thanks for your time.
    Ben
    60DegreeV6.com
    WOT-Tech.com

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    Captain of the Failboat SappySE107's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Pompano Beach, Florida
    Posts
    12,339
    What motor do you have? Anything that increases efficiency can increase mpg, but the best modifications are Tuning, Headers, and Heads. Hotter spark won't do it unless you have a single coil and distributor. Cam profile can be made for better MPG as well. Compression increases will help but only to a point, and then you have to make the motor less efficient at lower speeds to compensate for the cylinder pressure at higher RPM.

    On a grand am 3400, upgrading to 3500 heads and headers plus tuning showed 5-6 mpg increase.
    Ben
    60DegreeV6.com
    WOT-Tech.com

  4. #3
    Captain of the Failboat SappySE107's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Pompano Beach, Florida
    Posts
    12,339
    I have 1999 olds alero with the same 3.4l v6 as on the grand am.
    Is the 3500 heads with the same 3500 factory headers what you are
    talking about or are you talking about after market headers. Does port and
    polishing help
    increase mpg on heads. If you get the 3500 heads and use the thinner
    head gasket to raise compression would raising the 9 something to 11
    something
    compression ratio help mpg? And what tuning do you mean? The hotter
    spark I was talking about was Grantelli mpg ,close to zero ohms
    spark plug wires. On the JC whitney website buyers of Grantelli mpg
    spark plug wires commented on older autos it seemed to have better
    mpg increase than on newer autos. And people at fuel injector
    websites said that getting a newer type fuel injector( mine I think are
    leaking)
    with better atomization ,which newer ones are suppose to have but keep
    the same lb. at same pressure as factory would help mpg.
    How much would a cam increase mpg?
    I know this is alot.
    I really appreciate it.
    Ben
    60DegreeV6.com
    WOT-Tech.com

  5. #4
    Captain of the Failboat SappySE107's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Pompano Beach, Florida
    Posts
    12,339
    You have the same setup as a grand am then, and the 3500 heads and lower with a 3400 upper would give you more power and gas milage. The headers were S&S, but we will be making some based on our J and L body design, but modified for the N body. Port and polish can help mpg but only if it is done properly. Stock 3500 and the heads i port are perfect for efficiency, which means performance and mpg.

    Spark plug wires NEVER gain power or mpg unless the old wires were not working properly. Compare new vs new and its all the same.

    You cannot run a thinner gasket on the 3400 without risking piston to head contact. To gain any appreciable amount of compression, you will need new pistons.

    Newer injectors would help as well. I would run the 2000 and newer injectors and FPR, and tune the computer. Once I have experience with any local owners I can find, I will be able to offer PCMs tuned for the parts I sell and common stock combinations.
    Ben
    60DegreeV6.com
    WOT-Tech.com

  6. #5
    Captain of the Failboat SappySE107's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Pompano Beach, Florida
    Posts
    12,339
    Ok, that should be a good start for a discussion
    Ben
    60DegreeV6.com
    WOT-Tech.com

  7. #6
    W-Body for Life! robertisaar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Camden, Michigan, United States
    Posts
    5,233
    you didn't mention that extremely low resistance plug wires can have RFI issues?



    personally, i'm pretty interested in this topic as well, i need all the help i can get with 3400lb curb weight vehicles.
    1995 Monte Carlo LS 3100, 4T60E, OBD1 Conversion...for now, future plans include a 3900, T04E-46 (Knock-Off) turbo (For the 3100, ~T61 for the 3900), and a F40.
    Latest nAst1 files here!
    Need a wiring diagram for any GM car or truck from 82-06(and 07-08 cars)? PM me!

  8. #7
    Captain of the Failboat SappySE107's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Pompano Beach, Florida
    Posts
    12,339
    Yes, I prefer better EMI and RFI protection over wire resistance. Resistance seems more like a gimmick than an advantage with todays ignitions systems.

    The DIS-4 gave me 1 mpg but no power. This was with my old 3.1 MPFI grand prix, and it was comparing multiple tanks of gas with varied driving habits each time. Also compared at the drag strip for the power and ran the same times back to back to back to back.
    Ben
    60DegreeV6.com
    WOT-Tech.com

  9. #8
    I will be sure to post how my 3500 with the MPG cam and TOG headers works out... hoping to slap it back together yet this summer.
    2001 Grand Am GT
    2000 Grand Am GT

    "The world's best cam combined with a poor set of heads will produce an engine that's a dog. But bolt on a set of great heads even with a poor cam, and that engine will still make great power." ~John Lingenfelter

  10. #9
    Once my car is done getting tuned, itll be exciting to see what MPG's I can pull.

    But overall I think the best thing for MPG's is your right foot...
    Jay

    1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme SL
    -Modded
    1995 Chevy K1500 350c.i. 5spd Z71
    -Modded

  11. #10
    6 > 1 Superdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Quad Cities, Iowa
    Posts
    5,109
    In my experience (Tuning wise) there is only so much you can do for in-town mileage without hurting driveablity. If you start bumping up the SA the bucking starts with a 5 speed, Auto might be a bit more forgiving though. AE tuning helps for sure.

    Highway is a different story, internally stock 3400's running $A1 have reported over 35 highway MPG with a 5 speed. LCM is a wonderful thing.


    1989 Camaro RS; Cammed 3500 swap, 45mm ITB's, Street/Strip Kitted 700R4, 3500 stall, Megashifter, 3.73 posi, EQ- LT headers, 2.25" True Duals, X pipe, etc...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •