Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Tubular Control Arms

  1. #1
    Olds Sleeper kwhauck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Belle Fourche, SD
    Posts
    375

    Tubular Control Arms

    Ok, so generally tubular control arms save weight and are stiffer for auto-x (possibly launching at the track)

    In my case however, my tubular control arms are heavier than stock. That being said, what are the benefits to me? Just the stiffness?

    S...........L...........E...........E...........P...........E...........R

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    I'm putting aluminum control arms in my grandam. I honestly can't see any control arm being the weak link. I would assume the weak link in n-body setups to be bushings in general and I've never really been a fan of mcpherson strut type suspensions. Maybe if you really wanted to go hardcore, replace all the bushings and the strut mount with spherical bearings?

    hate to change subject, but does anyone know of adjustable strut mounts for n-bodys? I've seen them for w-bodies.

  4. #3
    They're probably stiffer, but the arms don't bend to begin with. People feel a huge difference when installing tubular arms because the rubber bushings in stockers deflect and tubular arms are usually shipped with poly bushings that greatly reduce deflection. A-arm style control arms are one of, if not the single, most advantageous place to use poly bushings. If you can get poly bushings to press in your lighter stock control arms on an n-body like you can a w-body, you may be better off. If not keep the tubulars. A little extra unspring weight will not undo what the bushings give you.
    Last edited by jman093; 05-04-2011 at 12:01 AM.
    Jesse M.

    1987 Monte Carlo SS Aerocoupe

  5. #4
    Olds Sleeper kwhauck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Belle Fourche, SD
    Posts
    375
    Here is a quick pic of the control arms......weighing in at 6.7 lbs as they are pictures I would say they are pretty close to stock which at roughly 7-8lbs, I know the 99 aluminum arms are 4lbs bare, not sure on total weight with the bushing and what not but i would imagine 5-6lbs......

    P1010133.JPG

    S...........L...........E...........E...........P...........E...........R

  6. #5
    those do look nice. Are those from that Overkill racing something or another guy?

  7. #6
    Olds Sleeper kwhauck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Belle Fourche, SD
    Posts
    375
    I'm honestly not sure where they are from (manufacturer wise)

    S...........L...........E...........E...........P...........E...........R

  8. #7

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    cumberland md
    Posts
    139
    check this oiut and it may just go thru http://www.j-body.org/forums/read.ph...54236&t=154208

  9. #8
    Olds Sleeper kwhauck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Belle Fourche, SD
    Posts
    375
    Quote Originally Posted by unchained01 View Post
    check this oiut and it may just go thru http://www.j-body.org/forums/read.ph...54236&t=154208
    $500, no thanks, I'll stick with the ones I have which look similar to RK, but they are definately not the same......

    S...........L...........E...........E...........P...........E...........R

  10. #9

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    cumberland md
    Posts
    139
    YEAH man i hear ya i just happened to be looking for alum control arms and found that thread .
    Last edited by unchained01; 05-09-2011 at 12:15 AM.

  11. #10
    Those will break in a matter of no time. I suggest that you get those gussets reinforced. That could be a serious crash is they break.

    Mark

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •