Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Buick with V-6 Engines: Under Six Seconds?

  1. #21
    Because stock sucks... pocket-rocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Elkhart, Indiana
    Posts
    5,406
    And more RWD cars so they can actually hook instead of put on a smoke show.
    -60v6's 2nd Jon M.
    91 Black Lumina Z34-5 speed
    92 Black Lumina Z34 5 speed
    94 Red Ford Ranger 2WD-5 speed
    Quote Originally Posted by TGP37 View Post
    Step up to a man trans, step up to a 5-speed.

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #22
    "Yes... I AM IRONMAN..." 60dgrzbelow0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    1,284
    Is this the engine in the car in the video?

    http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...iew/index.html

  4. #23
    W-Body for Life! robertisaar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Camden, Michigan, United States
    Posts
    5,233
    without a doubt, it's a hell of a lot easier to get a RWD/AWD car/truck into lower ETs than a FWD vehicle...

    enough boost, low enough weight and traction and even a 2.8 might be able to get there...

    well, some gen3 heads would help as well.
    1995 Monte Carlo LS 3100, 4T60E, OBD1 Conversion...for now, future plans include a 3900, T04E-46 (Knock-Off) turbo (For the 3100, ~T61 for the 3900), and a F40.
    Latest nAst1 files here!
    Need a wiring diagram for any GM car or truck from 82-06(and 07-08 cars)? PM me!

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •