-
Site Coder
FWD Wheelie Bars - Discussion
After seeing a few more FWD 60V6 cars starting to get into the low 13s and quickly pushing the 12-sec. envelope, I figured we might get into a (civilized) discussion as to what people think about wheelie bars on a FWD car.
To start off, here is my first link for discussion:
http://www.theoldone.com/archive/phy...wheeliebar.htm
As I stated, I want this to be a good discussion. If I see any threads that contain just stupid or ignorant comments, they will be deleted. Although most people will never think of doing this, I think there are people out there that just might be willing to try the idea out.
So let's go with that...
-
08-10-2005 01:43 PM
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
-
I can see it helping out a civic because of the short wheelbase but not so much with a J, L or w body. in that link they talked about reducing the rolling resistance on the car, you would think that would make it unstable in the top end???
1999 Olds Alero 2.4 to 3500 swap (running). totaled by a honda

1992 lumina 4 door 3500 3spd auto 15.020 @93.5 mph
1984 Cavalier type 10 hatch 3100 5spd!!!
14.96@91.47 in the 1/4
9.63@74.36 in the 1/8th
14.30 on slicks! scrapped due to rust!
-
Site Coder
Interesting that you brought the stability issue up... Here is a short discussion about that:
http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=76589&page=5
And as far as using them on a larger car...
-
Site Coder
And, from an NHRA Magazine article...
"Bergenholtz earned his nickname when he and his brother, Ron, reinvented the wheelie bar and then broke the 10-second benchmark in the quarter-mile. Wheelie bars are like car training wheels. They trail behind a dragster, preventing it from tipping over backwards on launch. The Bergenholtz brothers put wheelie bars on their '89 Honda CRX - a front-wheel-drive car, which, by definition, cannot wheelie. On a front-wheel-drive car, the (now slightly misnomered) wheelie bars shift the center of gravity forward. They prevent the rear shocks from compressing at launch. This is, in fact, genius in its simplicity: Gain traction by planting the front end more firmly on the tarmac."
-
I still watch ROBOTECH!

Originally Posted by
bszopi
They prevent the rear shocks from compressing at launch. This is, in fact, genius in its simplicity: Gain traction by planting the front end more firmly on the tarmac.[/b]"
I second that, the only reason i wouldnt just put steel rods in place of the rear shocks is for streetablity. otherwise if i had a drag only car it would have no rear suspension. maybe i'm stupid, but if the rear cant squat low, you cant shift the weight as much. on another note, when removing weight on a fwd, you want to start at the back. everything behind the real axel is dead, and whats in front of the front axle is whats going to help keep you planted.
If you aren't friends with a liar, you aren't friends with anyone.
-
The bars not only prevent the rear suspension from compressing, they effectively extended the wheelbase, which affects weight transfer more drastically than simply running solid shocks. The added ~20lbs behind the rear axle for the bars will more than pay for itself with increased traction.
I didn't read both of the links completely, but I think the biggest reason the serious drag cars have problems with steering at high speeds are 1) the bars are preloaded, 2) they run drag slicks, which tend to grow radially at higher speeds, effectively increasing the preload as speed increases, and 3) retractable wheelie bars aren't legal. So it is like driving with slicks on the front, and shopping cart wheel son the rear...not a recipe for stability, especially while braking.
Marty
'99 Z-28 - Weekend Driver
'98 Dodge Neon - Winter Beater
'84 X-11 - Time and Money Pit
'88 Fiero Formula - Bone stock for now
Quote of the week:

Originally Posted by
Aaron
This is why I don't build crappy headers. I'm not sure, I don't know too much about welding.
-
Captain of the Failboat
HAHAHAHA! wow, that sounds like a lot of fun! Actually, there is a better way to go about this. Go RWD. Why can't we just raise the rear end of a FWD anyway? Sure, it looks retarded without the real rear end back there, but if it makes a difference without stability at a speed and time my grand prix doesn't really care about seeing...im down for looking like a redneck.
I think increasing the rigidity of the car will help out quite a bit. Not having a frame has to be an issue at some point.
Ben
60DegreeV6.com
WOT-Tech.com
-
Kaiō-ken X 10
and i'm glad ben's opinion isn't an order. phew
-
Wood Hippie
I had a thought about FWD Ladder Bars. The geometry would be a little tough, but...you know me. I'll toss out any question. For the sake of theory.
Another theory..You lean your engine forward as you would to change plugs, (if you do it that way). Change everything else to match. You have effectively increased your weight transfer, with no added weight.
Here is another question, Why do ricers put a wing on the back of a car that needs front downforce? I know! Wing on the front looks stupider..
If you are driving a Chevy, everything else, is just a blur. 3.4 Carbon Footprint.

-
i can argue the wing thing to a point. i know when i put the factory spoiler onto my car it was more stable cornering at HIGH speeds (im talking 120km/h+). i have a friend that took his stock wing off his sunfire and at igh speeds, it wasnt as stable. however, a huge aluminum wing, a touring wing, or something stupid like a combat wing, they just do nothing but look stupid.