Support the Site!
|
Like what you see here? Support the site to help us continue to grow.
|
Stuff from our Store
|

|
|
|
Members currently using Flashchat: 0
|
 |
The most chatters online in one day was 3, 05-15-2008. No one is currently using the chat. |
 |
|
03-22-2008, 01:37 AM
|
#11
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 36
|
Hi there!
Canyonero, boring the intake to match the TBI is done for a couple of reasons;
1) On a stock 2.8 TBI intake, the 4.3's butterflies will hit the intake when you open the throttle. Your choices are to bore the intake or put a spacer under the TBI that has a bore size that matches.
2) Boring the intake lets the intake flow more air to match the additional air from the TBI. The 2.8 needs more air, and a larger TBI combined with the intake machined to match helps. Without machining the intake, the intake becomes a restriction.
__________________
1982 Chevrolet S-10 Sport, 2.8V6 TBI
1984 Chevrolet S-10 Blazer Sport, 2.8V6 TBI
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 01:40 AM
|
#12
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 36
|
Hi there!
I bought the Holley 502-3 2.8V6 TBI used several years ago, and ran it without any problems until I took two years to do paint/bodywork (I'm slow. and lots of things jumped ahead in line over those two years). After sitting for two years, one of the injectors stopped spraying. As far as I can tell, it just needs a good cleaning (i.e. LIndertech ) but I haven't gotten around to it. I have the TBI and the injector connectors (Holley used a different connector than GM) but not the adapter plate that allows it to be bolted to an unbored intake. If memory serves, I have tried it on an unbored intake and it does not have the same issues with the butterflies hitting the intake like the 4.3 TBI does. It has the "old" style 3-pin inline TPS connector. I am not using it, and do not plan to use it in the future. If someone is interested in it, ping me.
__________________
1982 Chevrolet S-10 Sport, 2.8V6 TBI
1984 Chevrolet S-10 Blazer Sport, 2.8V6 TBI
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 01:50 AM
|
#13
|
|
Used Isuzu Dealer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hood River, Oregon
Posts: 682
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwvess00
2) Boring the intake lets the intake flow more air to match the additional air from the TBI. The 2.8 needs more air, and a larger TBI combined with the intake machined to match helps. Without machining the intake, the intake becomes a restriction.
|
Yeah, that's what I was getting at. You don't HAVE to bore your intake to use a larger throttle body, but if your intake is still restricting you will only get partial benefit.
__________________
'90 Isuzu Trooper LS, 3.4L SFI V6 - swapped and awesome
'81 Isuzu I-Mark LS, 1.8L N/A Diesel
'94 Isuzu Trooper S, 3.2L SOHC V6 - mildly wrecked
'91 Isuzu Trooper SE, no engine - possible swap candidate
|
|
|
12-02-2008, 04:54 AM
|
#14
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7
|
so what do i need to do
i have a 1987 2.8 v6 can i get more horse power out of this
|
|
|
12-02-2008, 08:04 PM
|
#15
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 36
|
Hi there!
The easiest upgrade is the 3.4V6 crate engine from GM, or a '93-'95 3.4V6 Camaro long block. It is a bolt-in swap.
Otherwise, all of the standard hotrod methods work -- headers, cam, head work, different rocker arms with a higher ratio, bigger throttle body, machine work to the intake, etc.
__________________
1982 Chevrolet S-10 Sport, 2.8V6 TBI
1984 Chevrolet S-10 Blazer Sport, 2.8V6 TBI
|
|
|
12-04-2008, 04:10 AM
|
#16
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7
|
ok so the one out of the camaro
what do i have to do to make it fit? and how much power cani gain ? and if i fix up my 2.8 how much power could i get u think?
|
|
|
12-04-2008, 02:57 PM
|
#17
|
|
Iron Head Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Surrey, BC, Canada
Posts: 4,330
|
You don't have to do anything to make it fit. Externally it is an identical motor. Remove your old motor. Swap over your old accessories, intake, exhaust and the rest of the bits and drop in the 3.4L. Without doing anything special you get about 30hp and 50lbs more torque give or take. There are some details to doing it right so read the swap guide. You will find it on this site and on my site.
__________________
1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
1990 4Door, 2.8L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
Because... I am, CANADIAN
|
|
|
12-05-2008, 02:38 AM
|
#18
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7
|
cant find your site can you tell me where to find it and how much would a 3.4 motor cost?
|
|
|
12-05-2008, 11:29 AM
|
#19
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7
|
i have a 2.8 1987 s10 how much power can i get out of a 3.4 v6 its stock with 160hp if i buy a crate motor
|
|
|
12-05-2008, 03:17 PM
|
#20
|
|
Iron Head Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Surrey, BC, Canada
Posts: 4,330
|
http://members.shaw.ca/betterthanyou/
The Crate is rated at 160HP with the old 2SE 2bbl carburettor and stock cast iron exhaust manifolds.
A few years back a guy named moneyclip on s-series.org measured 187RWHP with a 3.4 Camaro motor and Edelbrock headers and throttle body injection. If you were to use the Crate engine you should do a bit better since the crate engine cam is pretty nice and should get the power up a bit more.
__________________
1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
1990 4Door, 2.8L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
Because... I am, CANADIAN
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|