Support the Site!
|
Like what you see here? Support the site to help us continue to grow.
|
Stuff from our Store
|

|
|
|
Members currently using Flashchat: 0
|
 |
The most chatters online in one day was 3, 05-15-2008. No one is currently using the chat. |
 |
|
12-01-2008, 02:53 PM
|
#1
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 45
|
roller or flat tappet cam?
So my next build is going to be my winter beater the 92 lumina. I'm sticking with the MPFI intake& heads because I like the low end grunt better. I know I like it better than the 3100/3400 because I've owned them both. My question is should I use the stock roller cam in the new engineI have (95 grand prix) or put a nice flat tappet in it? It will be a 3100 short block with the MPFI heads and intakes with 1.6 rockers, 2.8 head gaskets, CAI made by me, 3100/3400 intake valves, chip,2 1/4 exhaust,50 or 75 shot of nitrous. what do you guys think?
|
|
|
12-01-2008, 03:23 PM
|
#2
|
|
The Pink Car
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Warwick, RI
Posts: 1,559
|
Dumb... BUT on topic Why put a SFI bottom end together with a MPFI top end? Don't even bother using a 3x00 block if your using MPFI parts, just stick with the 3.1 and 2.8 stuff... Also IIRC there is no flat tappet option for a 3x00 block, so you would have to be doing roller no matter what.
__________________
Got Lope?
3500/3400 Hybrid, Stage 4 Boost Cam 216/240 .050 dur .517/.568 lift 112LSA
Ported, 3 Angle Valve Job, 65mm TCE TB, S&S Modified headers.
Rebuilt 4t60e, FD9 2095 stall Heavy Duty Converter, EP LSD, 3.69FDR
13.996@98.06 < N/A Hybrid 4T60E Combo
Daily 1995 OBDII Beretta Stock 3400, 4T60E, 3.06, 2060 stall.
13.818@100 < Old 100 shot 3400 4T60E combo
|
|
|
12-01-2008, 04:23 PM
|
#3
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 45
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3400-95-Modified
Dumb... BUT on topic Why put a SFI bottom end together with a MPFI top end? Don't even bother using a 3x00 block if your using MPFI parts, just stick with the 3.1 and 2.8 stuff... Also IIRC there is no flat tappet option for a 3x00 block, so you would have to be doing roller no matter what.
|
Dumb for doing what I'm doing... why so? I'm not putting one together the bottom end in the lumina has a thrust bearing going south so it's just a matter of time untill it fails. I already have a 3x00 pulled and just sitting on the shop floor from a past project. So why not put the 3x00 bottom end in it higher comp ratio and it has 1.6 rockers on it (non-roller rockers) and a roller cam. I also thought that you could convert a roller to a flat.
|
|
|
12-01-2008, 04:45 PM
|
#4
|
|
The Pink Car
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Warwick, RI
Posts: 1,559
|
With a 3x00 bottom end and 3.1 top end you will only get a 9.38:1 CR, where do you think it will be higher? Higher than a 3.1 Gen II but not higher than a 3100 or 3400...
It makes no sense to put a low flowing top end on top of a 3x00 bottom end, it's taking the power potential of the lower end and dropping it. Thats why I call it dumb.
And no, as far as I know unless a 3.1 cam fits a 3100 block, and I don't know about it, you can't drop down to flat tappet cams, and once again why bother, Ben can grind you anything you could ever desire.
__________________
Got Lope?
3500/3400 Hybrid, Stage 4 Boost Cam 216/240 .050 dur .517/.568 lift 112LSA
Ported, 3 Angle Valve Job, 65mm TCE TB, S&S Modified headers.
Rebuilt 4t60e, FD9 2095 stall Heavy Duty Converter, EP LSD, 3.69FDR
13.996@98.06 < N/A Hybrid 4T60E Combo
Daily 1995 OBDII Beretta Stock 3400, 4T60E, 3.06, 2060 stall.
13.818@100 < Old 100 shot 3400 4T60E combo
|
|
|
12-01-2008, 04:50 PM
|
#5
|
|
Iron Head Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Surrey, BC, Canada
Posts: 4,325
|
The difference in low end grunt is due to the camshaft difference not the heads and intake. Get the roller cam ground to make low end power and you will get it. You will get more of it too because you can get a ton more lift with less duration on a roller cam.
__________________
1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
1990 4Door, 2.8L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
Because... I am, CANADIAN
|
|
|
12-01-2008, 07:19 PM
|
#6
|
|
Good at breaking stuff
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Quad Cities, Iowa
Posts: 2,784
|
flat tappet cams will work in the roller block just fine.. you need to use the gen1/2 timing set though.
Don't put gen2 crap on a gen3 engine.. the 3100 makes more torque than the 3.1, and considerably more HP. The 3100 top end will also get you better gas mileage.
3.1 140 HP/180 TQ
3100 (small port)160 HP/190 TQ
3100 (large port) 175 HP/195 TQ
__________________
1991 Cavalier Z24 5 speed; 13.08 @ 105.5 mph, 3500 MPFI with a few upgrades... 275 WHP
2006 Trailblazer; 4.2/Auto Bone stock (under warranty)
2004 Grand Am GT; WAI
|
|
|
12-03-2008, 02:37 AM
|
#7
|
|
If I only had money!!!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Omaha Nebraska
Posts: 1,220
|
Also consider- a stock 3.1 head, especially exhaust, won't benefit with more than what a 1.6 rocker will give for lift. The combination of the restrictive intakes and the short duration cam is why there is good low and stout mid torque. They keep the velocity up to make torque. As far as powerband goes, you see my list of mods, I have to say the 3100/3400 has more TQ below 1500 rpm, less TQ between 2000-4000 rpm, and way more HP over 4500 rpm. Although, I'm comparing my Z to my 04 GASE with headers, PCM tune, CIA, and 65mm TB. Previously comparing the two cars as they sit, that is how the cars feel. I do know that if I could swap the GA's 3400 in the Z, I would feel differently.
I can never find a consistent hp rating anywhere.
What I've seen usually:
3.1 140 HP/ 185 TQ
3100 sp 155-160 HP/ 195 TQ
3100 lp 170 HP/ 195 TQ
__________________
Andy
fastest 1/8: 10.19@ 67.17
fastest 1/4: 16.16@ 82.70
62mm TB, 1.6 roller tip rockers, Ostrich 2.0, UD pulley, K&N drop in, 180* stat, 4T65E--3.69 LSD & Comp transmission controller
|
|
|
12-03-2008, 01:57 PM
|
#8
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 45
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3400-95-Modified
Ben can grind you anything you could ever desire.
|
OK, how much does Ben charge to grind a roller cam? This car is just the winter beater not the summer truck or the drag car (460 BB mustang) so I'm doing this project as bang for the buck and in my opinion there is no more bang for the $ better than nitrous.
|
|
|
12-03-2008, 01:58 PM
|
#9
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 45
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by betterthanyou
The difference in low end grunt is due to the camshaft difference not the heads and intake. Get the roller cam ground to make low end power and you will get it. You will get more of it too because you can get a ton more lift with less duration on a roller cam.
|
So the small long runners in the 3.1 intake have nothing to do with TQ? (not being a smart ass)
|
|
|
12-03-2008, 07:19 PM
|
#10
|
|
If I only had money!!!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Omaha Nebraska
Posts: 1,220
|
umm.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by torq455
The combination of the restrictive intakes and the short duration cam is why there is good low and stout mid torque. They keep the velocity up to make torque.
|
__________________
Andy
fastest 1/8: 10.19@ 67.17
fastest 1/4: 16.16@ 82.70
62mm TB, 1.6 roller tip rockers, Ostrich 2.0, UD pulley, K&N drop in, 180* stat, 4T65E--3.69 LSD & Comp transmission controller
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|