• 2012 V6 Product Guide

    GM has recently released their 2012 Product Guide, which details all of the engines and transmissions used in production vehicles, as well as the specs of the engines. Several years ago, we used to outline these updates, but have been lacking in getting the information out for the past few years. In an effort to try to keep the site up on the most recent releases from GM, I am trying to get this information back into articles again. With that said, on to the information.

    Car Engines


    Engine Name RPO Bore x Stroke Cam Comp Ratio Vehicles HP(kW)@RPM TQ(Nm)@RPM
    3.0L V6 VVT DI LFW 89.0 x 80.3 DOHC 11.7:1 CTS(Sedan/Wagon) [dual exhaust] 270hp(201kW) @7000 223lb-ft(302Nm) @5700
    CTS Sedan [single exhaust] 265hp(198kW) @7000 220lb-ft(298Nm) @5700
    3.6L V6 VVT DI LFX 94.0 x 85.6 DOHC 11.5:1 Camaro(Coupe/Convertible) 323hp(241kW) @6800 278lb-ft(377Nm) @4800
    CTS(Coupe/Sedan/Wagon) 318hp(237kW) @6800 275lb-ft(373Nm) @4900
    Caprice Police Vehicle 301hp(225kW) @6700 265lb-ft(359Nm) @4800
    Impala Police Vehicle 302hp(225kW) @6800 262lb-ft(355Nm) @5300
    Impala 300hp(223kW) @6500 262lb-ft(355Nm) @5300
    LaCrosse 303hp(226kW) @6800 264lb-ft(358Nm) @5300
    3.6L VVT LY7 94.0 x 85.6 DOHC 10.2:1 Malibu 252hp(188kW) @6300 251lb-ft(340Nm) @3200

    Truck Engines

    Engine Name RPO Bore x Stroke Cam Comp Ratio Vehicles HP(kW)@RPM TQ(Nm)@RPM
    3.0L V6 VVT DI LFW 89.0 x 80.3 DOHC 11.7:1 Equinox, Terrain, Captiva Sport(Fleet Only) 264hp(197kW) @6950 222lb-ft(301Nm) @5100
    3.6L V6 VVT DI LLT 94.0 x 85.6 DOHC 11.3:1 Acadia, Enclave, Traverse [dual exhaust] 288hp(215kW) @6300 270lb-ft(366Nm) @3400
    Traverse [single exhaust] 281hp(210kW) @6300 266lb-ft(361Nm) @3400
    3.6L V6 VVT DI LFX 94.0 x 85.6 DOHC 11.5:1 SRX 308hp(230kW) @6800 265lb-ft(359Nm) @2400

    • All engines feature a cast aluminum block
    • The engines are assembled at the following locations:
      • St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada
      • Ramos Arizpe, Mexico
      • Melbourne, Australia
      • Flint, Michigan
      • Suzuki, Japan
    Comments 3 Comments
    1. bszopi's Avatar
      bszopi -
      I am just impressed by the difference in power between the DI and standard injection. Granted, the CR is slightly less in the non-DI engines, but wouldn't think that would account for between 50-75 less horsepower. The low-peak torque for the truck versions is quite impressive as well.
    1. TechRod's Avatar
      TechRod -
      I'm wondering if the LFX is going to become the Chevette swap of choice, if not it'll probably boil down to the complexity of the wiring and integrated exhaust manifolds. I guess I'll find out in a couple of years when the owners of these new Camaros start yanking those V6s and swapping V8s in.
    1. geldartb's Avatar
      geldartb -
      Quote Originally Posted by bszopi View Post
      The low-peak torque for the truck versions is quite impressive as well.
      almost in the range of low peak torque on a diesel with that.

      i was noticing the difference in power levels with the different version of the engines before. same engine size wise but one was DI and the other was a regular one.