• Welcome!

    Welcome to 60DegreeV6.com, the best source for all your GM 60°V6 needs.

    If you have a question, please visit the forums and ask there. If you are not the type of person to post on forums, there are also years of previous discussions to browse and search through.

    If you would like to add content to the site, click on the "Create New Article" button on the right side of the screen. We are always looking for people to add content to the site in order to further expand the site to continue to benefit the community. If you aren't sure on how to create an article, check out our tutorial.

  • 3.6L DI Heads w/Integrated Exhaust Manifolds

    I think we have briefly discussed the new integrated exhaust manifold heads in the forums before, and it seemed most people were against it with the inability to install better flowing headers, etc. After watching the video, and reading the associated article, it actually seems that these may have some good potential. It sure would be interesting to get one of these heads to take a hands-on look at. With that said, onto the video and article!



    Originally from GM Powertrain...
    PONTIAC, Mich. – In auto production, more power, better fuel economy and fewer emissions rarely appear together. But the 2012 Camaro 3.6L direct injection V6 engine achieves all three by combining the exhaust manifold with the cylinder head into a single aluminum casting.

    Each integrated exhaust manifold cylinder head – a V6 has two -- replaces a cast iron exhaust manifold, six bolts, a gasket and a heat shield and three bolts. By eliminating this joint, the potential for a gasket failure is eliminated. And the change reduces engine weight by 13 lbs. or 6 kg per engine. Reducing mass helps improve fuel economy and the 2012 Camaro 2LS model is EPA estimated at 30 mpg highway.

    “Reducing engine mass of this magnitude doesn’t happen often,” said Ameer Haider, GM assistant chief engineer for V6 engines. “Engineering usually looks for reduction in terms of grams not pounds. It’s just like removing a set of golf clubs from your car when you don’t need them – ultimately it saves fuel. When combined with other mass reductions, the customer will see better fuel economy over time with better performance.”

    Extensive simulation and bench testing was performed to perfect cylinder-head airflow. Intake airflow is improved 7 percent with the use of larger intake valves (38.3 mm v. 36.9 mm), which are primarily responsible for an increase of 11 horsepower. Exhaust flow is 10 percent better than the previous V6.

    Lower emissions, narrower engine size and noise reduction round out the list of benefits for the new head design. With the catalytic converter closer to the engine exhaust point, the emissions reduction process begins sooner, resulting in lower emissions. The new cylinder heads decrease the overall width of the engine by 4.6 inches (117 mm) for significantly more packaging space in the engine bay making underhood work easier. Due to less surface area, the new design contributes to a 1 decibel reduction in engine noise at idle.

    “The new, patented design benefits the customer in all the key areas without any tradeoffs, said Haider. “Emissions, performance, fuel economy, and noise all improve with the integrated exhaust manifold.”
    Comments 11 Comments
    1. HOYS's Avatar
      HOYS -
      Very awesome find on that video!

      Interesting that they don't flow heads with intakes on them...
    1. blackbombshell95's Avatar
      blackbombshell95 -
      Nice video, that dude was scared sh*tless. Someone must of twisted his arm to speak infront of a camera.
    1. pocket-rocket's Avatar
      pocket-rocket -
      I expected the exhaust manis to look a bit different than that, and not as much detail as they paid put into them. I would still want to see back to back flow tests of integrated and non-integrated tests done to be sold on it though, although it could help the swap guys out quite a bit.
    1. SappySE107's Avatar
      SappySE107 -
      Iterations, gotta love computers and what they can do for R&D. I would bet they have flow numbers for everything, muffler and air filter included.
    1. bszopi's Avatar
      bszopi -
      The fact that it saves off 13lbs is a nice feature as well.
    1. pocket-rocket's Avatar
      pocket-rocket -
      I bet their only concern is that the heads with manis flow as much as separate manifolds, not with the intakes like we would be interested in seeing. Those would be a pain to polish, so good luck, Ben
    1. unchained01's Avatar
      unchained01 -
      Thats not as bad as i thought either And WOW porting these will be kind of a challenge even thou they said they maximized the airflow
    1. Driver_10's Avatar
      Driver_10 -
      Ill tell you one thing... turbo charging one of these puppies will be an absolute "cake-walk". Fab up a couple of simple t-3 adapters and slap on a set of twins and your'e done. The hot-side is finished in a snap! It ought to make "odd-ball" engine swaps hella easy too since the all you need are a couple of down-pipes. As for porting, the only real means of porting that I can think of would be extrusion abrasion porting.
    1. mfuller's Avatar
      mfuller -
      The weight savings are nice, and with the "vanes" in the exhaust manifold, they're like quasi-shorty headers.
      And yes, it would appear quite easy to bolt on twin snails (in a RWD application, anyway).
    1. Driver_10's Avatar
      Driver_10 -
      I dont know if anyone noticed, but he mentioned a 90hp/per liter capability. Do The math... thats 324hp!!
    1. Fierobuffoon's Avatar
      Fierobuffoon -
      well you can extrude hone the exhaust side, but what they save are all of the production costs in bolts, manifolds and labor to assemble a more parts intensive engine, same as the dodge 3.6, but why in the world dont they get better fuel economy- emissions requirements is why-

      my grand am with the 3.4 got 36 mpg .poor camaro owners